Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 16161 invoked by uid 6000); 26 Jan 1998 16:27:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 16155 invoked from network); 26 Jan 1998 16:27:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail3.bellglobal.com) (198.235.216.132) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 1998 16:27:04 -0000 Received: from inet-dev ([199.243.250.207]) by mail3.bellglobal.com (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP id AAA2476 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 11:26:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 11:29:57 -0500 (EST) From: rasmus@bellglobal.com Subject: Re: Changing httpd.h To: new-httpd@apache.org In-Reply-To: <34CCAE4E.3BE2B18D@Golux.Com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org > Bumping the MMN wouldn't have kept your build from breaking; it's a > run-time control, not a compile-time one. Bumping the MMN alone never prevents a build from breaking. But, in my build process I check MMN for all sorts of stuff, and this could have been one. if MMN > whatever, add -I.../ap, for example. > Of course, this issue would be a complete non-issue if we had > a single src/include directory. That's been proposed, and a > couple of people have said it sounds like a good idea, but > I'm still suspicious - what will the impact be on Win32, for instance? This would make life easier on me. Having to add -I's for src/main, src/os/unix and src/ap is a pain. -Rasmus