Message-ID: <B0000006508@paxsys.com>
From: "Paul Brophy" <pbrophy@paxsys.com>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Window's Makefiles
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:34:41 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

Maybe, but it's not that simple.  I build for Intel & Alpha targets. Since
the Unix guys can't test the Windows makefiles before they commit them,
they shouldn't change them. 
It's easy to maintain with the IDE (If I didnt want an IDE, I'd use WATCOM
C++) & I can be sure that the makefiles/workspaces actually work. 

Paul
----------
> From: Dean Gaudet <dgaudet@arctic.org>
> To: 'new-httpd@apache.org'
> Subject: RE: Window's Makefiles
> Date: Friday, January 23, 1998 2:23 PM
> 
> I think you miss some of the point though... if the windows makefiles
were
> anywhere similar to the unix makefiles then the unix guys could maintain
> them and avoid breaking the build.  nmake is based on unix make... it's
> not all that much different.
> 
> Dean