Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 10317 invoked by uid 6000); 29 Jan 1998 22:58:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 10299 invoked from network); 29 Jan 1998 22:58:50 -0000 Received: from eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (194.128.162.193) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 1998 22:58:50 -0000 Received: from freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.6]) by eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA11868 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 1998 22:57:59 GMT Received: from algroup.co.uk (naughty.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.107]) by freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA08593 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 1998 22:57:55 GMT Message-ID: <34D10957.AE838BC1@algroup.co.uk> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 22:57:27 +0000 From: Ben Laurie Organization: A.L. Digital Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Creating src/include in 1.3 References: <34D0EC26.3DF26227@Golux.Com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > Dean Gaudet wrote: > > > > I don't have a strong opinion about it though... > > Well, I do. We say all over the place that main_server settings provide > vhost defaults - and this clearly violates that. It should be fixed. Well, exactly, and that was my point. The snag is that there's this distinction between per-server and per-dir configs. Per-dir's don't know about servers, which is pretty bogus IMO. I'm not quite sure what we should do about it, except to say that I think it should be one of the areas we give serious thought to in 2.0. This comes back to my rather ancient proposal about just generally sort of matching things and thus ending up with a configuration, which didn't really make distinctions between things like which host, which directory, what URL, or even which browser. They were just things that could be matched to provide config. I'd like to see it fixed in 1.3, less sure about 1.2.x (mainly because I suspect it involves substantial code change). Cheers, Ben. -- Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686|Apache Group member Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |Apache-SSL author A.L. Digital Ltd, |http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache