Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 5220 invoked by uid 6000); 25 Jan 1998 19:52:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 5206 invoked from network); 25 Jan 1998 19:52:26 -0000 Received: from nni.nni.com (206.205.234.3) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 1998 19:52:26 -0000 Received: from topsail.org (West-Chest-dialup-060.nni.com [209.116.190.144]) by nni.nni.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO205-101c) ID# 0-43033U15000L10000S0) with ESMTP id AAA338 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 1998 14:53:14 -0500 Message-ID: <34CB97F5.69D15A53@topsail.org> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 1998 14:52:21 -0500 From: Chuck Murcko Organization: The Topsail Group[ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Naming conventions for 2.* (and maybe 1.3+?) References: <199801251440.JAA05952@devsys.jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Ben Laurie wrote: > > > > Perhaps we should. The point of os_ was, to me, to delineate those parts > > that may have to be rewritten according to the platform. I think that is > > a useful distinction. And, yes, it may lead to us having to rename > > things as we progress. > > > > Agreed > Yes, OS level is one of those places where you have to do abstraction to keep the code base sane. -- chuck Chuck Murcko The Topsail Group West Chester PA USA chuck@topsail.org