Message-ID: <34B660F1.FB1D5EA@algroup.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 17:40:01 +0000
From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
Organization: A.L. Digital Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: Intel Port & Release Process
References: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980109092917.15436C-100000@valis.worldgate.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

Marc Slemko wrote:
> The problem is that much of the code here is more interrelated and needs
> to be better on a per line basis because it simply isn't as big as some
> projects.  Voting has raised a heck of a lot of objections to all sorts of
> patches, mine included.  You can do this stuff after the fact, but the
> problem is that if no one has time to pursue it, it just falls away.

I'd say that the solution to this is to say that if anyone has a problem
with a particular patch then it MUST be backed out and use the
review-then-commit model.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie            |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686|Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant  |Fax:   +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |Apache-SSL author
A.L. Digital Ltd,     |http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
London, England.      |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache