Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 11966 invoked by uid 6000); 1 Feb 1998 02:58:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 11960 invoked from network); 1 Feb 1998 02:58:35 -0000 Received: from devsys.jagunet.com (206.156.208.6) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 1998 02:58:35 -0000 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.8.8/jag-2.4) id VAA17184 for new-httpd@apache.org; Sat, 31 Jan 1998 21:58:31 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199802010258.VAA17184@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: apache-2.0 now clean To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 21:58:31 +73900 (EST) In-Reply-To: <9801311819.aa26019@paris.ics.uci.edu> from "Roy T. Fielding" at Jan 31, 98 06:17:49 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Ahhh... unilateral decisions. How I love them. Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > There is nothing I hate more than seeing people waste time for > nothing other than the sake of wasting time. There is no reason > to mirror 1.3b stuff in the 2.0 repository, so it has been deleted. > In any case, making large updates to 2.0 just to mimic a bunch of > small updates to 1.3 is utterly stupid -- you don't even retain a > good commit log that way. > > We can repopulate the repository when 1.3.0 is done. Right now, > everyone should delete any checked-out apache-2.0 modules and > then checkout a fresh apache-2.0 (update will not work!). > You can then start committing the plans everyone keeps talking > about that are currently on servers elsewhere, so that we can > all read them and start looking for common themes. > > ....Roy > -- ==================================================================== Jim Jagielski | jaguNET Access Services jim@jaguNET.com | http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"