Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 19299 invoked by uid 6000); 20 Jan 1998 05:06:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 19291 invoked from network); 20 Jan 1998 05:06:55 -0000 Received: from tiber.cisco.com (171.69.3.202) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 1998 05:06:55 -0000 Received: (ikluft@localhost) by tiber.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.2-SunOS.5.5.1.sun4/8.6.5) id VAA02640 for new-httpd@apache.org; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 21:06:23 -0800 (PST) From: Ian Kluft Message-Id: <199801200506.VAA02640@tiber.cisco.com> Subject: Re: ZDNet redeems itself a bit from the Pang wanker To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 21:06:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: from "Rasmus Lerdorf" at Jan 19, 98 11:21:57 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org > From: rasmus@lerdorf.on.ca (Rasmus Lerdorf) > http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/story/story_1665.html Hmmm... they seem to keep brushing off commercial support for Apache as completely nonexistent. (i.e. the Zona survey that she refers to completely omits Apache under that assumption.) Anyone want to bounce around the idea of putting a "Products & Support" link on the Apache home page and point to a list of vendors and consultants who claim to provide support? A "strategy for the next 50%" :-) would probably need to help give some more weight to the commercial Apache vendors, even if stopping short of official endorsements. -- Ian Kluft KO6YQ PP-ASEL Cisco Systems, Inc. ikluft@cisco.com (work) ikluft@thunder.sbay.org (home) San Jose, CA