Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 14657 invoked by uid 6000); 10 Jan 1998 03:58:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 14651 invoked from network); 10 Jan 1998 03:58:45 -0000 Received: from devsys.jagunet.com (206.156.208.6) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 1998 03:58:45 -0000 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.8.7/jag-2.4) id WAA10908 for new-httpd@apache.org; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 22:58:40 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199801100358.WAA10908@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: Intel Port & Release Process To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 22:58:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <199801100331.TAA06447@gabber.c2.net> from "sameer" at Jan 9, 98 07:31:31 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org sameer wrote: > > > Unless other stuff has been commited at that time it seems, in which > > case you'll need to trim that stuff out so you don't > > reverse that :) > > yeah, but how often does a commit happen within a minute of > another commit? > Well, there have been times when commits have happened within hours of each other :) I'm sure we could find some with an hour of each other as well :) If we looked hard enough. No biggie. Like I said, I didn't know how CVS implemented backing out patches, and the answer was you do it but commiting a patch which backs out the previous one (mostly). -- ==================================================================== Jim Jagielski | jaguNET Access Services jim@jaguNET.com | http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"