Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 12816 invoked by uid 6000); 8 Jan 1998 14:49:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 12810 invoked from network); 8 Jan 1998 14:49:01 -0000 Received: from tiber.cisco.com (171.69.3.202) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 1998 14:49:01 -0000 Received: (ikluft@localhost) by tiber.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.2-SunOS.5.5.1.sun4/8.6.5) id GAA12913 for new-httpd@apache.org; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 06:48:13 -0800 (PST) From: Ian Kluft Message-Id: <199801081448.GAA12913@tiber.cisco.com> Subject: Re: voting To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 06:48:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: from "Gregory A Lundberg" at Jan 8, 98 09:33:06 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org > From: Gregory A Lundberg > On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, Ian Kluft wrote: > > Maybe call it the "temporary accelerated development" privilege or something > > like that. If the idea is adopted, it should probably be codified as an > > amendment to the voting procedures. > > Rome tried this a few thousand years ago. The job title is "Ceasar". It > worked for a while but eventually led to the downfall of the Republic and > the rise of the Empire. Nice try. But that analogy falls apart so fast that I wonder if you read the part about responsibilities coming with the privilege? If anyone (or several people) were to be granted the privilege, the idea as stated so far would be that it's temporary and they'd still have to report to the list what they do with the privilege. Hardly sounds like an emperor! How about a more serious comment... It was a serious suggestion. -- Ian Kluft KO6YQ PP-ASEL Cisco Systems, Inc. ikluft@cisco.com (work) ikluft@thunder.sbay.org (home) San Jose, CA