httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Hartill <>
Subject Re: New commit rules
Date Sun, 11 Jan 1998 16:31:27 GMT
On Sat, 10 Jan 1998, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> I would have to say that I agree with Pauls concerns and ideas.
> I would ask that everyone read over again the current voting
> guidelines, not for what's said specifically, but the tone that
> runs through everything. And, with that in mind, let's maintain that
> "feeling" with the implementation of the new development process.
> (eg: even the Lazy Voting mode has a caveat that if one plans
>  on using that, it must be specifically mentioned that the
>  patcher plans on using the LV mode... it's obvious that throughout
>  the present voting guidelines there is a real desire to make
>  sure that everyone knows whats going one, and that "prolific"
>  do not have more say in Apache's development than other
>  team members).

Perhaps everyone's concerns can be addressed with the following
simple rule:

 "ideas must be review-then-commit, patches can be commit-then-review"

That probably covers everything.

Rob Hartill                              Internet Movie Database (Ltd)   .. a site for sore eyes.

View raw message