httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <dgau...@arctic.org>
Subject Re: ok, patches are committed
Date Mon, 05 Jan 1998 22:59:26 GMT
That's fine, I just wanted to be sure we didn't need it in 1.2.  Ok looks
good.  So I'll start posting what I have against 1.3 on tues or weds
depending on my workload. 

Dean

On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Marc Slemko wrote:

> Your http_vhost was one, but that is 1.3 only.
> 
> The strlen(palloc(...)) length one was another, but that is fixed and
> wasn't a problem normally anyway.
> 
> Can't think of any others and I would prefer to leave them out.  Unless
> something else would cause problems...
> 
> 
> On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Dean Gaudet wrote:
> 
> > Do we need the ap_snprintf len == 0 patch in 1.2?  ISTR a few cases where
> > len == 0 was a possibility but I forget if that's 1.2 or 1.3 code. 
> > 
> > Dean
> > 
> > On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Marc Slemko wrote:
> > 
> > > The patches are committed, although someone may want to be sure I didn't
> > > screw anything up more than I already noticed...
> > > 
> > > Randy, you volunteered to roll the tarball, right?
> > > 
> > > I think we are about ready to roll and put it up somewhere for testing.
> > > Hmm... how about we name it something different (eg. kewl_virus.tar.gz)
> > > when it is put up for testing?  That should help reduce the chances of
> > > people picking it up when they shouldn't.
> > > 
> > > After that, we are close to ready for release.  Please verify that it
> > > works right.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message