httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com>
Subject RE: Window's Makefiles
Date Fri, 23 Jan 1998 19:41:19 GMT
On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, Sam Robb wrote:

> No, I followed that point... I'm just questioning whether
> it's worth doing it this way.
> 
> DSP files are just text files... and the format's pretty
> easy to follow.  Couldn't most changes (adding a #define,
> a source file, etc) be done by editing the DSP instead of
> the makefile?

If you can live with makefiles being autogenerated and don't have to
change them for any reason; if you did, you would be continually
re-editing them.

You still can't really have non-NT developres editing .dsp or .mak files
without being able to test.  It just doesn't make sense.

> 
> - Samrobb (srobb@wisewire.com)
> - WiseWire Corporation - "Information - Online, On Target, All the Time"
> - http://www.wisewire.com
> - http://www.lycos.com/webguides/webguides.html
> 
> The box said 'Requires Windows 95, or better.' So I bought a Macintosh.
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Dean Gaudet [SMTP:dgaudet@arctic.org]
> > Sent:	Friday, January 23, 1998 2:24 PM
> > To:	'new-httpd@apache.org'
> > Subject:	RE: Window's Makefiles
> > 
> > I think you miss some of the point though... if the windows makefiles
> > were
> > anywhere similar to the unix makefiles then the unix guys could
> > maintain
> > them and avoid breaking the build.  nmake is based on unix make...
> > it's
> > not all that much different.
> > 
> > Dean
> > 
> > On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, Sam Robb wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm comfortable with the Visual C++ IDE, and with having
> > > it generate makefiles for me.  Last night, I spent about
> > > 10 minutes adding a new profiling target to the makefiles
> > > for NT using the IDE.  If I had to do it by hand, it never
> > > would have gotten done.
> 


Mime
View raw message