httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com>
Subject Re: SINGLE_LISTEN_ACCEPT_NOMUTEX
Date Thu, 22 Jan 1998 15:09:47 GMT
On Thu, 22 Jan 1998, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> Marc Slemko wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 22 Jan 1998, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > 
> > > I plan on changing SAFE_UNSERIALISED_ACCEPTS to SINGLE_LISTEN_ACCEPT_NOMUTEX
> > > since it better describes the actual condition... Other suggestions
> > > welcome
> > 
> > Mmm.  I kindof like SAFE_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT.
> > SINGLE_LISTEN_ACCEPT_NOMUTEX seems somewhat... long and disjoint.
> > 
> 
> yeah, it's long, but SAFE_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT isn't exactly true
> because it's only valid with the single-listen case... I'd
> prefer the define actually describing the actual condition.

It describes the OS, not the implementation.

So the OS supports safe unserialized accepts; if Apache needs them for
other reasons is a different matter.


Mime
View raw message