httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Slemko <>
Subject Re: [PATCH] lets do 1.2.5
Date Wed, 07 Jan 1998 19:16:17 GMT
I will decline to make any comment on this since no comment is justified.

On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> Marc Slemko wrote:
> > 
> > You are too late, we have already decided that this should be done and
> > done it in 1.3 a long time ago.
> > 
> > I see no reason to impose restrictions on what people can and can't say
> > their compiler is without cause.
> > 
> Excuse me, but we were talking about 1.2.6, not 1.3. What's in 1.3
> is NOT what we were talking about... We were talking about
> making a change (which isn't needed because as far as I can
> tell the latest 1.2 CVS _does_ allow CC=gcc -<whatever> in
> Configuration) which I think is wrong. What if they wanted to be
> able to put '-static' in CFLAGS and have it work all the time?
> Would we simply say "Wow... that's flexible. Let's do it" or would
> we think about it for about 2 seconds and say "well, it really
> doesn't belong there".
> And I find it quite strange how when anyone wishes to impose
> restrictions you jump and down and say No, unless, of course,
> it's you who want the restrictions.
> What is it exactly about yourself that is soooooo special? I
> think it's fantastic that you answer so many things on the
> comp....servers.unix NG, but your answers always have this
> tone of superiority about them ("You are aware of course that..."
> and "If you would look at the documentation it would be obvious..."
> -- yes, these are paraphrases).
> Whew! I've said _way too much_ already... but families like this
> do have spats...
> -- 
> ====================================================================
>       Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
>           |
>             "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"

View raw message