httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com>
Subject Re: ok, patches are committed
Date Mon, 05 Jan 1998 22:36:53 GMT
Your http_vhost was one, but that is 1.3 only.

The strlen(palloc(...)) length one was another, but that is fixed and
wasn't a problem normally anyway.

Can't think of any others and I would prefer to leave them out.  Unless
something else would cause problems...


On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Dean Gaudet wrote:

> Do we need the ap_snprintf len == 0 patch in 1.2?  ISTR a few cases where
> len == 0 was a possibility but I forget if that's 1.2 or 1.3 code. 
> 
> Dean
> 
> On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Marc Slemko wrote:
> 
> > The patches are committed, although someone may want to be sure I didn't
> > screw anything up more than I already noticed...
> > 
> > Randy, you volunteered to roll the tarball, right?
> > 
> > I think we are about ready to roll and put it up somewhere for testing.
> > Hmm... how about we name it something different (eg. kewl_virus.tar.gz)
> > when it is put up for testing?  That should help reduce the chances of
> > people picking it up when they shouldn't.
> > 
> > After that, we are close to ready for release.  Please verify that it
> > works right.
> > 
> > 
> 


Mime
View raw message