httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paul Brophy" <>
Subject Re: Window's Makefiles
Date Fri, 23 Jan 1998 20:13:52 GMT
Time. And considering how much we're all getting paid for this... If I'm
working on the NT build, do I really want to tweak n-thousand makefiles
(and invoke the wrath of those platform supporters)? I think not.

How about we only officially support non vc++ environments. Then, those of
who prefer IDEs will continue working as we do now (and this discussion can

Now if we only had a per platform/compiler demi-god...

> From: Dean Gaudet <>
> To:
> Subject: Re: Window's Makefiles
> Date: Friday, January 23, 1998 3:07 PM
> This seems quite stupid.  Beyond a CC definition, a linker definition,
> a librarian definition, all of these files should be the same.  Why
> we support only visual c++ when we could support more windows compilation
> environments?
> Dean

View raw message