httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: SINGLE_LISTEN_ACCEPT_NOMUTEX
Date Thu, 22 Jan 1998 14:55:20 GMT
Marc Slemko wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 22 Jan 1998, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> > I plan on changing SAFE_UNSERIALISED_ACCEPTS to SINGLE_LISTEN_ACCEPT_NOMUTEX
> > since it better describes the actual condition... Other suggestions
> > welcome
> 
> Mmm.  I kindof like SAFE_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT.
> SINGLE_LISTEN_ACCEPT_NOMUTEX seems somewhat... long and disjoint.
> 

yeah, it's long, but SAFE_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT isn't exactly true
because it's only valid with the single-listen case... I'd
prefer the define actually describing the actual condition.


-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"

Mime
View raw message