httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Intel Port & Release Process
Date Fri, 09 Jan 1998 23:53:19 GMT
Marc Slemko wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> > Ben Laurie wrote:
> > > 
> > > Marc Slemko wrote:
> > > > The problem is that much of the code here is more interrelated and needs
> > > > to be better on a per line basis because it simply isn't as big as some
> > > > projects.  Voting has raised a heck of a lot of objections to all sorts
of
> > > > patches, mine included.  You can do this stuff after the fact, but the
> > > > problem is that if no one has time to pursue it, it just falls away.
> > > 
> > > I'd say that the solution to this is to say that if anyone has a problem
> > > with a particular patch then it MUST be backed out and use the
> > > review-then-commit model.
> > > 
> > 
> > >From a totally clueless person (and it might be in the FMs) how does
> > one back out a specific commit?
> 
> You don't.  CVS doesn't support it.
> 
> You just find the diff, reverse (eg. diff the version nums in the opposite
> directory, patch -R, etc) it and apply it. 
> 

Oh... With all the discussion about "the power of CVS" I thought that
somehow you could tell cvs to take out commits # A, B and C and
cvs would handle everything else.

-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"

Mime
View raw message