httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Randy Terbush <>
Subject Re: Change
Date Fri, 09 Jan 1998 04:42:11 GMT
On Thu, Jan 08, 1998 at 07:06:49PM -0800, Dean Gaudet wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Change is good.
> > 
> > Example 1: The current process of posting patches and then having
> > M-ID in status. A nice change IMO would be to place the patches
> > somewhere under the CVS tree to allow easy and consistant access
> > to the patches. Change-type: Evolutionary. As far as I can recall,
> > Dean thought this sucked, even though it helped some people out.
> Dean thinks this sucks because it was presented as an additional duty to
> perform while patching the code as opposed to replacing the duty of
> posting the patch to new-httpd.  If the proposal is really to replace the
> posting of the patch then say so, and get rid of apache-cvs and direct all
> cvs commits to new-httpd.  It seems foolish for folks to subscribe to both
> lists, and if they don't subscribe to apache-cvs they may wonder what's
> going on.  It's not like apache-cvs is high volume. 
> Aren't all freebsd commits sent to the main discussion lists?

No. And I would not want to clutter new-httpd with even more fluff
to filter out. The current setup is very easy to filter into it's
own archive.

View raw message