Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 20491 invoked by uid 6000); 31 Dec 1997 00:10:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 20485 invoked from network); 31 Dec 1997 00:10:09 -0000 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org (204.62.130.91) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 31 Dec 1997 00:10:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 16106 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 1997 00:11:58 -0000 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 16:11:58 -0800 (PST) From: Dean Gaudet To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apachen/src/modules/proxy proxy_util.c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-Comment: Visit http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. Organization: Transmeta Corp. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Oh I thought you were supposed to hit ctrl-alt-del to take care of that situation. It is kind of like a game I guess, so it still qualifies for my remarks ;) Dean On Tue, 30 Dec 1997, Marc Slemko wrote: > Come on, you are missing the fun of being logged in as Administrator > trying to kill a hundred copies of bash all running at the same due to a > damn fork bomb. Not only do you have the pretty GUI to contend with, but > it gives me a permission denied message when I try to kill them. Ain't > services great. > > I got Apache to stop, but it didn't kill the CGIs properly. Well, not > that I would blame this on Apache necessarily... > > (yea, so I wrote the fork bomb. So? Was writing a CGI and accidently > created a loop due to forgetting the bastard practice of running programs > from the cwd even if it isn't in the path) > > On Tue, 30 Dec 1997, Dean Gaudet wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 30 Dec 1997, Ben Laurie wrote: > > > > > I think there are gadgets that do this (I could be wrong). I wouldn't be > > > brave enough to install them. > > > > I used to run xmouse under win95, which provides the more useful x-style > > focus, but I forget what applications get screwed up because they're > > written with the "active is always on top" mentality. I seem to recall it > > screwing up winquake. Which of course is a bad thing, I mean, what the > > hell else do people run windows for except to play games? > > > > I hear they've got glquake for linux now too, so that's one less reason > > for me to run windows. > > > > :) > > > > Dean > > > >