Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 12666 invoked by uid 6000); 8 Dec 1997 00:59:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 12659 invoked from network); 8 Dec 1997 00:59:24 -0000 Received: from saga22.stanford.edu (171.64.15.152) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 1997 00:59:24 -0000 Received: (from akosut@localhost) by saga22.Stanford.EDU (8.8.8/8.8.4) id QAA10621; Sun, 7 Dec 1997 16:59:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 16:59:17 -0800 (PST) From: Alexei Kosut To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Apache performance on Windows In-Reply-To: <199712080034.AAA01905@aaaaaaaa.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Mon, 8 Dec 1997, Andrew Wilson wrote: > Alexei > > > > P.S. We need to add "mp3" to the audio/mpeg entry in mime.types. > > Just another one of those block-rockin beats. > > It's cool. Like FSP all over again. Thigpen will love it. > > YAy! Umm... what the heck does this mean? And now I'm really confused again. I tried to transfer the same file, one more time, this time under Windows 95 (with the same binary used for NT). The resultant time was 17 seconds. If you check my earlier message, you'll note that I found times of 22 seconds for Linux and 28 seconds for Windows NT. Does this make sense? It doesn't to me. Maybe network conditions are much more of a factor than I'm considering (it is an hour later). *sigh* -- Alexei Kosut Stanford University, Class of 2001 * Apache *