Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 21369 invoked by uid 6000); 31 Dec 1997 04:48:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 21363 invoked by uid 24); 31 Dec 1997 04:48:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 20207 invoked from network); 31 Dec 1997 04:41:40 -0000 Received: from proxy.telebusiness.co.nz (usr24@203.97.136.12) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 31 Dec 1997 04:41:40 -0000 Received: from 202.36.232.252 by proxy.telebusiness.co.nz with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.0.1458.49) id ZP50526P; Wed, 31 Dec 1997 17:42:18 +1300 Message-ID: <34A9CD24.C42F352A@telebusiness.co.nz> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 17:42:12 +1300 From: Doug MacEachern Organization: SITEL Telebusiness NZ, Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.30 i486) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: new_connection() rename request References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Dean Gaudet wrote: > Or to make it static ... except I can hear Doug screaming already. aaaaaaahhhhh!!!! ;-) Yeah, the DCE plugin uses new_connection(), I'm +1 on renaming to ap_new_connection(). Actually, 1.3b3 already did break it, when two of the pools in http_main (pconf and ptrans) became static, it broke. There's a global pointer to one, I forget which, but I had to un-static the other for it to work again. But, I found this the day before I left to live in a different country and work at a different company (with no DCE) for at least a few months, so I haven't been able to follow up yet. -Doug > Dean > > On Mon, 29 Dec 1997 rasmus@bellglobal.com wrote: > > > The Apache new_connection() function in http_main.c conflicts with a function > > of the same name in the umich ldap library. Since new_connection() isn't > > an Apache API function, it shouldn't be a big deal to change it to > > ap_new_connection(), should it? > > > > -Rasmus > >