Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 26762 invoked by uid 6000); 8 Dec 1997 20:36:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 26756 invoked from network); 8 Dec 1997 20:36:40 -0000 Received: from eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (194.128.162.193) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 1997 20:36:40 -0000 Received: from freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.6]) by eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA00759 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 1997 20:35:52 GMT Received: from algroup.co.uk (naughty.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.107]) by freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA21002 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 1997 20:35:45 GMT Message-ID: <348C5A0A.E75B3C8@algroup.co.uk> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 1997 20:35:22 +0000 From: Ben Laurie Organization: A.L. Digital Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: mutex in palloc References: <199712041647.LAA19381@siam.gensym> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Ben Hyde wrote: > > Is the critical region in palloc so narrow > because allocation in a given pool is never > done by more than a single thread? I haven't checked the code, but that seems like a rash assumption, if true. Cheers, Ben. -- Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686|Apache Group member Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |Apache-SSL author A.L. Digital Ltd, |http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache