Message-Id: <199712170141.RAA24825@Radar.Catch22.COM>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem with 1.3b3 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Dec 1997 22:18:47 +0100."
             <XFMail.971216221847.sfx@unix-ag.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 17:41:57 -0800
From: James Dornan <james@Catch22.com>
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

> According to James Dornan:
> 
> >  This seems to have activated the real host. I red the vhost documentation
> >  and there is nothing stating that the real host will be ignored. One must
> >  agree  that having the real host have a vost entry is strange. It should
> >  really be pointed out.
> 
> Well, there's the following text in
> http://www.apache.org/docs/vhosts/details.html
> 
>   The main_server is only used to serve a request if the IP address and port
>   number to which the client connected is unspecified and does not match any
>   other vhost (including a _default_ vhost). In other words the main_server
>   only catches a request for an unspecified address/port combination (unless
>   there is a _default_ vhost which matches that port). 

Oh, that make it all so damned clear. Did a lawyer write that?

> 
> 
> 
> ciao...
> -- 
> Lars Eilebrecht                   - Scott me up Beamy, I'm conhow somefused.
> sfx@unix-ag.org
> http://www.si.unix-ag.org/~sfx/