Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 21027 invoked by uid 6000); 1 Dec 1997 23:32:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 20926 invoked from network); 1 Dec 1997 23:32:30 -0000 Received: from devsys.jagunet.com (206.156.208.6) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 1997 23:32:30 -0000 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.8.7/jag-2.4) id SAA17629 for new-httpd@apache.org; Mon, 1 Dec 1997 18:32:25 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199712012332.SAA17629@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Configure to say how to make Configuration To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 18:32:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <01BCFE83.2426E170.dda@individual.com> from "David D'Antonio" at Dec 1, 97 06:01:24 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org David D'Antonio wrote: > > Anyway, I'm not proposing any such thing, just pointing out a reason > why you might want different levels of installation and modules under > Win32. > I agree with this... The Win32 "market" is much different. -- ==================================================================== Jim Jagielski | jaguNET Access Services jim@jaguNET.com | http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"