httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Sutton <p...@ukweb.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Configure to say how to make Configuration
Date Tue, 02 Dec 1997 16:09:11 GMT
On Mon, 1 Dec 1997, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> >From the fingers of Martin Kraemer flowed the following:
> >Yes, that's why I brought the dbm/db question to the table: I have
> >several OS's here which don't come with a db library. OTOH I assume
> >recent *bsd systems don't use dbm any longer. The "canonical set"
> >could therefore only be empty.
> 
>     For things like DB support, true.  But other modules don't have any
>     dependencies upon the OS - such as the proxy, mod_setenvif,
>     mod_mime, mod_alias, mod_acces, mod_rewrite, ...  Those can be
>     included in the canonical set.

I agree. There are some (minor) differences caused by particular OS'es. 
But the majority of modules can be included on any build - rewrite, proxy,
setenvif, etc. We should decide which modules are going into the default
binary builds, then make all builds include those modules. And the
Configuration file should be updated to build the same set of modules, by
default. People can easily comment in or out the AddModule lines as they
need, but at least they are starting with something consistent with the
binary kits. 

//pcs



Mime
View raw message