httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.C...@Golux.Com>
Subject Re: ap_ routines
Date Wed, 24 Dec 1997 13:30:16 GMT
This reminds me..  We're nominally futzing with the API,
particularly in changing the behaviour of ap_snprintf()
(never mind that the change is to correct naughty behaviour),
so isn't it about time to ++ MMN?

It also occurs to me that since we bump MMN when introducing
a potential API incompatibility with That Which Has Gone Before,
anyone who has to rebuild its modules as a result should be
able to easily find out what required the bump so it can ensure
that the modules aren't counting on the now-defunct behaviour.
For instance, maybe there's a module out there that depends
on the 0-length meaning sprintf() behaviour.  I don't think
ferreting this out of CHANGES is necessarily the simplest task
in the world; perhaps we should provide a file in the tree
with a short (but meaningful) blurb for each bump?

#ken	P-)}

View raw message