httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Kraemer <Martin.Krae...@mch.sni.de>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Configure to say how to make Configuration
Date Mon, 01 Dec 1997 21:52:45 GMT
On Mon, Dec 01, 1997 at 04:41:00PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>     Sorry, the canonical list to which I was referring was the one
>     proposed earlier (by Paul?  I forget) - namely, that all binary kits
>     we build should have the *same* module list.  Whatever it includes,
>     it thereby becomes canonical.

Yes, that's why I brought the dbm/db question to the table: I have
several OS's here which don't come with a db library. OTOH I assume
recent *bsd systems don't use dbm any longer. The "canonical set"
could therefore only be empty.

>     Or do you think that the modules we include in our binary kits
>     should vary from kit to kit?
Nope, but given that problem, I think I better withdraw my idea to
add a binary apackage for ReliantUnix  :-(

    Martin
-- 
| S I E M E N S |  <Martin.Kraemer@mch.sni.de>  |      Siemens Nixdorf
| ------------- |   Voice: +49-89-636-46021     |  Informationssysteme AG
| N I X D O R F |   FAX:   +49-89-636-44994     |   81730 Munich, Germany
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~My opinions only, of course; pgp key available on request

Mime
View raw message