httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Configure to say how to make Configuration
Date Mon, 01 Dec 1997 22:07:43 GMT
Martin Kraemer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 1997 at 04:41:00PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> >     Sorry, the canonical list to which I was referring was the one
> >     proposed earlier (by Paul?  I forget) - namely, that all binary kits
> >     we build should have the *same* module list.  Whatever it includes,
> >     it thereby becomes canonical.
> Yes, that's why I brought the dbm/db question to the table: I have
> several OS's here which don't come with a db library. OTOH I assume
> recent *bsd systems don't use dbm any longer. The "canonical set"
> could therefore only be empty.

I'm under the feeling that the pre-built binaries are best suited
for low-end and basic sites. As such, neither will need or use
databases so there is no need for that module to be included.

      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services           |
            "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"

View raw message