httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David D'Antonio" <...@individual.com>
Subject RE: [PATCH] Configure to say how to make Configuration
Date Mon, 01 Dec 1997 22:20:02 GMT
On Monday, December 01, 1997 5:11 PM, Jim Jagielski 
[SMTP:jim@jaguNET.com] wrote:
[snip]

> My own personal feeling is that the pre-built binaries should
> be as
> small and simple as possible, since that's most likely the
> type
> of site that would be using it. Sites that need modules like
> database
> auth and other goodies most likely have what it takes to build
> their
> own binary. Our pre-builts should NOT have as much stuff as
> possible.

*If* you want to compete with IIS (and who doesn't? :-), you 
might want a
prebuilt Win32 binary with a selection of modules to try to 
match IIS (including
the ASP stuff). One cannot be quite as certain that folks at an 
Win32 shop
will have all the tools (or knowledge) on how to build a "full 
featured" Apache.

Of course, that type of shop will probably want to but support 
too, so it might
be a moot point.

>       Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
>      jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
>             "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"

DDA

--
David D'Antonio CNE - dda@SpamBeGone.individual.com
 Some they do and some they don't and some ya just can't tell
  Some they will and some they won't and some it's just as well
						-SuperTramp



Mime
View raw message