httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From C...@PROCESS.COM (Rodent of Unusual Size)
Subject Re: [PATCH] Configure to say how to make Configuration
Date Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT
>From the fingers of Martin Kraemer flowed the following:
>
>On Mon, Dec 01, 1997 at 02:36:00PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>>                                                 the need to edit the
>>     Configuration to include the canonical module list (as well as the
>			       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>     compilation settings, for a binary release).
>The only problem is that IMHO there's really no such thing as a
>generic "canonical module list". Think of the DBM vs. DB problem.
>Rather, each OS has its own "canonical module list", and this list
>can even depend on the OS release number.

    Sorry, the canonical list to which I was referring was the one
    proposed earlier (by Paul?  I forget) - namely, that all binary kits
    we build should have the *same* module list.  Whatever it includes,
    it thereby becomes canonical.

    Or do you think that the modules we include in our binary kits
    should vary from kit to kit?

    #ken    P-)}

Mime
View raw message