Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 24422 invoked by uid 6000); 24 Nov 1997 06:21:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 24416 invoked from network); 24 Nov 1997 06:21:47 -0000 Received: from paris.ics.uci.edu (mmdf@128.195.1.50) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 1997 06:21:47 -0000 Received: from kiwi.ics.uci.edu by paris.ics.uci.edu id aa02628; 23 Nov 97 22:18 PST To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [STATUS] 1.3b4-dev Sat Nov 22 18:26:26 EST 1997 In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Nov 1997 18:27:19 EST." <199711222327.SAA14817@devsys.jaguNET.com> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 22:03:08 -0800 From: "Roy T. Fielding" Message-ID: <9711232218.aa02628@paris.ics.uci.edu> Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org >Not sure if I captured everything... sifting through >loads of Email Nope, you are still missing my votes. > * Martin's [PATCH] add |APLOG_NOERRNO to proxy log messages > <19971121224118.02034@deejai.mch.sni.de> > Status: Martin +1, Dean +1 +1 > * Marc's [PATCH] fix strtoul > > Status: Marc +1, Jim +1, Martin +1, Dean +1 This was already committed > * Paul Eggert's [PATCH] suexec/1343: year-2000 bug in suexec log > > Status: Martin +1, Marc +1, Dean (Wants something more common) +1 > * Martin's [PATCH] "Signing" server generated pages > <19971107213952.59974@deejai.mch.sni.de> > Status: Martin +1, Wrong patch (I vetoed this one). +0 to the replacement of 11/22 <19971122001602.03385@deejai.mch.sni.de> > * Marc's [PATCH] define to allow passing of Authorization header > > Status: Marc +1, Dean +1 (with note), Paul +1 +1 > * Dean's protocol/1195: Bug in Authentication header (fwd) > > Status: Conceptual: Dean +1, Paul +1, Martin +1, Ken +1 This one isn't a patch. > * Martin's [PATCH] [FEATURE] Clickable Path Components in ftp dir header > <19971011014829.41276@deejai.mch.sni.de> > <19971011022937.31959@deejai.mch.sni.de> > Status: Martin +1, Ken +1 +1 (it is also a bug fix). > * 206 vs. 200 issue on Content-Length > See The current behavior is correct. A range which extends beyond the actual length of the entity is possible in cases where a device is attempting to limit the response size (think PDA) even when it doesn't yet know the actual length. At least, that was the goal. ....Roy