httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Laurie <...@algroup.co.uk>
Subject Re: [STATUS] 1.3b3-dev Thu Nov 6 16:25:51 EST 1997
Date Sun, 09 Nov 1997 07:43:56 GMT
Dean Gaudet wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Martin Kraemer wrote:
> 
> > >     * 206 vs. 200 issue on Content-Length
> > I guess it was: Content-Range: bytes=
> 
> Actually, see Marc's message.
> <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971102000930.5555B-100000@valis.worldgate.com> We're
> supposed to give 200 with a complete response when there is a bogus
> byterange... not patch it up and send a 206.  Do you want to take this
> one?

This has come up on the HTTP WG recently, as a result of the HTTP
interop testing (is anyone doing that, BTW?). Can't quite remember the
outcome, except the RFC is getting patched.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie            |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686|Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant  |Fax:   +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |Apache-SSL author
A.L. Digital Ltd,     |http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
London, England.      |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache

Mime
View raw message