Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 4545 invoked by uid 6000); 29 Oct 1997 20:50:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 4538 invoked from network); 29 Oct 1997 20:50:18 -0000 Received: from dns.omniport.net (sambo@206.54.164.2) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 1997 20:50:18 -0000 Received: (from sambo@localhost) by dns.omniport.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) id OAA13024; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 14:50:30 -0600 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 14:50:30 -0600 Message-Id: <199710292050.OAA13024@dns.omniport.net> From: Sam Rasins Organization: Caribe Enterprises, Inc. X-URL: http://www.Caribe-Enterprises.com/Caribe/ To: New HTTPd Development Subject: Re: related commercial projects In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971028211257.00995210@localhost> References: <3.0.3.32.19971028193253.0091c890@hyperreal.org> Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Brian et. al., >Speaking of jobs, and knowing that everyone here is overloaded; what do >folks think about coming up with a list of "open positions", and sending >that to apache-announce? Right now it's really difficult for someone >enthusiastic about Apache to know what needs doing, and also gain the >authority to actually accomplish it within our structure. I'd like to open >things up a little bit more, and this seems like a good way to do that. > >Thoughts? The jobs-list is a great idea ... and a good start at improving the volume of work that The Apache Group can produce. I agree that someone that is "enthusiastic about Apache" may find it difficult to even begin to know what has to be done. It is my belief that it is (and should be) difficult to become a member of the Apache Group. This is a *GOOD* thing. The downside of it is that there are a lot of able minds and fingers available for producing input to the process of developing "THE Best HTTPd Server in the WWWorld!!!" ... that have no "official" channel to offer their comments, suggestions, and help. Yes, there are mail lists, but NOT targeted specifically to those who would like to contribute, but do not know the code, do not have the time, do not have the resources, do not have the skill, are frightened by all the "other" things one must master (CVS, pserver, the bug-list, etc.), or any other reason for not being able to be a "member". What I'd like to propose is a separate forum for the folks that WANT to help but can't really BE an Apache Group Member. This mail-list (like the "real" list ... new-httpd) can serve as a "minor-league" or grooming stop for future Full-Members. It would require one or two Full-Members to moderate (watch and comment) the list and to [this is important] provide opportunities for "real Apache" work to be done. What I mean by this is that the Full-Members can send "tasks" to the "httpd-assist@apache.org" list [for lask of a better name] which the rest of the Full-Apache members agree can/should be handled by the httpd-assist group. Of course, the general idea is to offload some tasks to the httpd-assist list to give you guys some breathing room and allow others a fertile ground to help. To make it work, the Apache Group members would have to try and STAY AWAY from those tasks that have been "given" to the httpd-assist group. Then, as solutions are produced by the httpd-assist list, they can be culled out (by the moderators) and presented to the new-httpd list for "official" voting. Personally, I have been wanting to do more than just read the list, scratch my head at times, say "ah-ha" many times, and in general marvel at the incredible speed and efficiency this group works. I have noticed in the last few days (months) that though a lot of improvement has developed ... your efficiency has been under seige due to the volume of tasks to be done. Try an addendum list to off-load the *SIMPLER* tasks. Thank you, all of you, for your time and efforts into Apache. I am one of many who benefit from your toil. I also thank you for taking the time to read and reflect on the ideas presented above. Regards, Sambo P-) Good leaders being scarce, following yourself is allowed. {NOTE: The [random] quote above was provided via the 'fortune' program.}