From: sameer <sameer@c2.net>
Message-Id: <199710271730.JAA26676@gabber.c2.net>
Subject: Re: [STATUS] Fri Oct 24 21:45:20 EDT 1997
In-Reply-To: <009BC5A7E757F544.0C92@PROCESS.COM> from Rodent of Unusual Size
 at "Oct 26, 97 02:57:00 pm"
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 09:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Cc: new-httpd@apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

	I am +1 on a tray.

> >From the fingers of Paul Sutton flowed the following:
> >
> >On Sat, 25 Oct 1997, Ken A L Coar wrote:
> >>     * DDA's adding a tray application to the Windoze version for ease of
> >>       status/management.
> >>        <01BCDB29.2C04DEB0@caravan.individual.com>
> >>        <01BCDB2A.F8C09010@caravan.individual.com>
> >> 
> >>     I'm +1 on putting this in during the beta cycle.
> >
> >I'm kind of not in favour of anything which is '95 specific. I don't think
> >it is a good enough OS(*) to run a web server on. I would rather
> >concentrate on making it work as well as possible under NT (and in
> >particular NT5), which has a very different control/interface metaphor.
> 
>     I don't understand.  What's W95-specific about a trayapp?  I use
>     them all the time on my NT4 box, too.  Sure, they don't work on NT3,
>     but is anyone running 1.3b2 on that platform?
> 
>     #ken    P-)}
> 


-- 
Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-986-8770
President					FAX:     510-986-8777
C2Net
http://www.c2.net/				sameer@c2.net