Message-ID: <19971017214602.61307@deejai.mch.sni.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 21:46:02 +0200
From: Martin Kraemer <Martin.Kraemer@mch.sni.de>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: Announcement rough framework
References: <19971017211343.11991@deejai.mch.sni.de>
 <199710171940.PAA29072@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <199710171940.PAA29072@devsys.jaguNET.com>;
 from Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> on Fri, Oct 17, 1997 at 04:40:10PM -0400
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

On Fri, Oct 17, 1997 at 04:40:10PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Erg. That's bad since there has been some discussion going on
> about it. The Announcement file is now in the CVS tree. Announcements
> should be placed to the pertinant Usenet groups (eg:
> comp.infosystems.servers.unix, comp.infosystems.www.servers.misc and
> comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms-windows) as well as the
> apache-announce list
On Taz, I tried to use "rtin" and the supplied NNTPSERV, and it said
"connection refused". Or should I post the announcements from here?

And _when_? ASAP - or after a settling period to find out if 1.3b2 compiles
everywhere? (It compiles on mips-sni-svr4) Or after Ben says he's rolled
apache-1.3b2.zip?

> However, the Announcement, in it's current form, states that MS
> binaries for 1.3b2 won't be available, which is most likely
> not this case; Ben is rolling one :)
That'd be not a problem, I could change that paragraph.

    Martin
-- 
| S I E M E N S |  <Martin.Kraemer@mch.sni.de>  |      Siemens Nixdorf
| ------------- |   Voice: +49-89-636-46021     |  Informationssysteme AG
| N I X D O R F |   FAX:   +49-89-636-44994     |   81730 Munich, Germany
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~My opinions only, of course; pgp key available on request