Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 18963 invoked by uid 6000); 16 Oct 1997 21:27:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 18945 invoked from network); 16 Oct 1997 21:27:08 -0000 Received: from gabber.c2.net (208.139.36.80) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 1997 21:27:08 -0000 Received: (from sameer@localhost) by gabber.c2.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA26651 for new-httpd@apache.org; Thu, 16 Oct 1997 14:26:00 -0700 (PDT) From: sameer Message-Id: <199710162126.OAA26651@gabber.c2.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Suggestion for HTTP_PROTO(maj,min) macro In-Reply-To: <19971016231351.46281@deejai.mch.sni.de> from Martin Kraemer at "Oct 16, 97 11:13:51 pm" To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 14:26:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL34 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org I thought this was already +1'd. > I sometimes wondered if there was a better (or more intuitive) way to say... > if (r->proto_num >= 1001) ... > I would prefer, like, > if (r->proto_num >= HTTP_PROTO(1,1)) ... -- Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-986-8770 President FAX: 510-986-8777 C2Net http://www.c2.net/ sameer@c2.net