httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lars Eilebrecht <>
Subject RE: NameVirtualHost
Date Sun, 26 Oct 1997 14:20:44 GMT
According to Dean Gaudet:

> > Seems silly since is not a virtual host in this case.
> > It's the real host.  Thought we had bashed this one to death, but I guess
> > not.  Still lots of confusion.
>  Pretend there's no such thing as "the real host"... there isn't in the
>  code.  There's just a _default_ host, and you can explicitly override it
>  if you want.

Hmmm... as far as I understand the code the first vhost following a
NameVirtualHost directive is used as a default if a connect on that
IP has an unknown or no Host: header. So what is the deal with a
"_default_" vhost? In what case do I need such a vhost?

Lars Eilebrecht                     - Modesty: Being comfortable that others                                will discover your greatness.

View raw message