httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <dgau...@arctic.org>
Subject RE: NameVirtualHost
Date Sat, 25 Oct 1997 23:12:45 GMT
See there I go confusing another old timer.

No, you need exactly one "NameVirtualHost ip:port" for each ip:port pair
on which you want to do name-vhost processing.

Dean

On Sat, 25 Oct 1997, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:

> > But, as I understand it, simply adding a single NameVirtualHost directive
> > is _not_ sufficient for current setups where people have one IP address
> > for their main server and all name virtual hosts.
> 
> Are you saying that each and every <VirtualHost> block needs a
> NameVirtualHost <IP>:<Port> line?
> 
> -Rasmus
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message