httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Laurie <...@algroup.co.uk>
Subject Re: in progress: vhosts yet again
Date Sun, 05 Oct 1997 11:27:24 GMT
Mark J Cox wrote:
> 
> > Wildcard ports utterly suck.  But I'm guessing that you SSL weenies need
> > me to not screw them up.  Given that port-vhosting hasn't ever worked
> > correctly with name-vhosting I'm not at all concerned about making it
> > work now.  So here's what I'm asserting:
> 
> Host: based virtual hosts don't work well with SSL anyway (the server
> doesn't get the Host: header until after all the negotiation and
> certificate stuff has been done by which time it's a bit late).  I've not
> seen people do wildcard ports with SSL; Stronghold just sticks in a
> Listen *:443 and then <VirtualHost *:443> section.

Ditto for Apache-SSL (ish).

> The only thing to watch is that if someone connects to https://somewhere/
> my copy of Netscape sends "Host: somewhere" and not "Host: somewhere:443"

Which is correct, of course.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie            |Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435|Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant  |Fax:   +44 (181) 994 6472|http://www.apache.org
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |Apache-SSL author
A.L. Digital Ltd,     |http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
London, England.      |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache

Mime
View raw message