httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: binary for win32 in 1.3b2?
Date Fri, 17 Oct 1997 13:26:27 GMT
Ben Laurie wrote:
> 
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > 
> > Ben Laurie wrote:
> > >
> > > FWIW I've given a couple of non-experts copies of the prototype install,
> > > and they've got 'em working, so I'd say a binary (or, better, an
> > > install) would be a Good Thing. I think stuff has been committed since
> > > 1.3b2, so if people want, I could roll a 1.3b3 Windoze install, or even
> > > backtrack to 1.3b2 (it did get tagged, right?) and roll one of those. I
> > > can probably find time to do this over the w/e.
> > >
> > 
> > Arg. Nope, I forgot to tag it.
> 
> Well, if someone has the energy to tag it, I'll use that, otherwise I'll
> do a 1.3b3, OK?
> 

I'll move back to 1.3b2, tag, and then bring back up.

-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"

Mime
View raw message