Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA14264; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 11:43:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from veal.organic.com (h20.n145.organic.com [204.152.145.20]) by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA14233 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 11:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (akosut@localhost) by veal.organic.com (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA10506 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 11:43:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: veal.organic.com: akosut owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 11:42:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Alexei Kosut To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: OS abstraction, inlining functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Thu, 4 Sep 1997, Paul Sutton wrote: > One question: should we call the abstraction functions ap_XXX() or > os_XXX(). Previously ap_XXX() has been used throughout (ap_signal, > ap_select etc). Now os_canonical_filename has been added. Shouldn't that > be renamed ap_canonical_filname? Well, os_canonical_filename was named after os_escape_path(), which has been around for a long while. But maybe we should change them. I dunno. -- Alexei Kosut