Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA07149;
	Thu, 25 Sep 1997 20:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from valis.worldgate.com (marcs@valis.worldgate.com [198.161.84.2])
	by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA07134
	for <new-httpd@apache.org>; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 20:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost)
	by valis.worldgate.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA29786
	for <new-httpd@apache.org>; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 21:15:35 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 21:15:34 -0600 (MDT)
From: Marc Slemko <marcs@worldgate.com>
To: Apache - BYOC <new-httpd@apache.org>
Subject: apache in the press
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970925210855.11947C-100000@valis.worldgate.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

http://www.zdnet.com/zdimag/zdlabs/who.serve/
http://www.zdnet.com/zdimag/zdlabs/who.test/
http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/story/story_1284.html    

The latter is from the 26th, the others are from the 15th but I haven't
seen mentioned yet.

Their performance graph is interesting.  If I'm reading their tiny dotted
lines right (makes me go blind at 1280x1024), Apache was actually the best
performer (by a small margin) out of all their servers when running CGI
(anything else isn't a comparison since Apache wasn't tested with anything
else).  They don't happen to mention the fact that Apache rules, but...
<g>