Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA05015;
	Wed, 3 Sep 1997 13:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DECUS.Org (Topaz.DECUS.Org [192.67.173.1])
	by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA04947
	for <New-HTTPd@apache.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 13:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Master.DECUS.Org (master.process.com) by DECUS.Org (PMDF
 V4.2-13
 #26234) id <01IN7NHZUFAO8WVZSV@DECUS.Org>; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 16:22:48 EDT
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 16:25:21 -0400
From: coar@decus.org (Rodent of Unusual Size)
Subject: Re: some remarks (bugs ?) (fwd)
To: New-HTTPd@apache.org, Coar@decus.org
Message-id: <97090316252187@decus.org>
X-VMS-To: NH
X-VMS-Cc: COAR
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

>From the fingers of Marc Slemko flowed the following:
>
>>     You know, I just had a similar brainstorm about this the other night
>>     (after the feature-freeze, unfortunately): make mod_access RE-aware.
>>     Could address a *lot* of the confusions we've seen about "from .x.com"
>>     versus "from x.com"..
>
>Not really, because I still don't think we could change "from x.com" to
>be different than "from .x.com".

    Why not?

      Allow from ~ ^x\.com$
      Deny from ~ .*\.x\.com$

    Or am I being thick again?

    #ken    P-)}