Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA12344;
	Thu, 4 Sep 1997 16:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from devsys.jaguNET.com (devsys.jaguNET.com [206.156.208.6])
	by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA12295
	for <new-httpd@apache.org>; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 16:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.8.7/jag-2.4) id
 TAA07377 for new-httpd@apache.org; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 19:15:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <199709042315.TAA07377@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: spawn_child question
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 19:15:53 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970904160624.13250A-100000@veal.organic.com> from
 "Alexei Kosut" at Sep 4, 97 04:08:09 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Content-Type: text
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

Alexei Kosut wrote:
> 
> 
> Well, according to the Windows API docs that I've read, they are. The
> exec*() functions and fork() are described alongside the spawn*()
> functions, so I'd assume they're available...
> 

Maybe you or Ben could contact Ambarish and find out why he choose
the method he did. :/

-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"