Message-Id: <199709031641.LAA07574@sierra.zyzzyva.com>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: loglevels complaint 
In-reply-to: dgaudet's message of Wed, 03 Sep 1997 09:25:26 -0700.
         <Pine.LNX.3.95dg3.970903092511.29996E-100000@twinlark.arctic.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 11:41:35 -0500
From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com>
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

That seems like a good compromise. We can then either set default 
to be INFO level, or for those who want to see restart info, run 
their servers at the higher level.

I fully expect some tweaking to happen in these logging changes. 
I'll make these changes this evening unless someone beats me to it.


> I'd rather see "send lost body" go down to debug.
> 
> Dean
> 
> On Tue, 2 Sep 1997, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> 
> > At 11:41 PM 9/2/97 -0500, Randy Terbush wrote:
> > >I understand your point and frustration. However, in my possibly 
> > >unique opinion, default logging in Apache is too verbose. Most 
> > >other similar software requires that the administrator turn up the 
> > >volume rather than turning it down.
> > >
> > >I'd be interested in other opinions about this. From my 
> > >perspective, I answer way too many questions about things that 
> > >appear in the error log that are really unimportant. I've tried to 
> > >keep that in mind while doing this to let the important errors come 
> > >through at the default level.
> > 
> > I am happy to see "send lost body", et al go away.  I am not nearly as
> > happy to see the restart message go away.  Could we elevate the level of
> > that blurb?  It's not an 'error' I guess, but more useful than most stuff
> > at the 'info' level.
> > 
> > 	Brian
> > 
> > 
> > --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
> > "Why not?" - TL           brian@organic.com - hyperreal.org - apache.org
> >