httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <dgau...@arctic.org>
Subject Re: [STATUS] 1.3b1: Tue Sep 30 10:00:33 PDT 1997
Date Tue, 30 Sep 1997 23:38:14 GMT
I'd be happy with us releasing 1.3.0 now and calling it unstable ;)  We'd
be closer to target then! 

Seriously, I don't mind a naming scheme that goes 1.3.0, 1.3.1, ... and we
periodically call things stable releases.  But I'm not up for debating
this stuff, status quo works for me. 

Dean

On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> >How about a new release level: Final Candidate? We work on betas
> >which reflect a work-in-progress. When we have a version that
> >we think is stable enough to be the possible true release, it's
> 
> Ummm, terminology ... "stable" means it isn't likely to change,
> not that its highly reliable.  A version that always crashes is stable.
> What we need is a category for "on the cutting edge, but more reliable
> than our last stable release".
> 
> Oh, and I still think they should be number 1.3.0, 1.3.1, ... from the
> get go.  *shrug*
> 
> ....Roy
> 


Mime
View raw message