httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Randy Terbush <ra...@zyzzyva.com>
Subject Re: 1.3 versus 1.3.1
Date Thu, 11 Sep 1997 02:00:34 GMT

I feel you have support to commit this Paul.


> On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Alexei Kosut wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Dean Gaudet wrote:
> > > Where's NT at?  we dunno really, right?  'cause we need to release another
> > > version and get more people to whack on it.  I honestly think we'll be
> > > stuck with several betas, enough to shake out bugs with those two
> > > features. 
> > 
> > Well, I think NT's close. Although I think OS abstraction should wait
> > until later, I'd like to see an os_absolute_path macro somewhere, because
> 
> Does this mean that you don't think the patches to *enable* OS-specific
> abstractions (i.e. in os/*/os.{c,h})  should be committed for 1.3? If
> committed, it ould enable the few os abstractions required for 1.3 to be
> implemented in a consistent manner. I am worried if we don't have the
> ability to add os specific code now, when 1.3 becomes a binary realese and
> the floodgates are opened to every NT user to try Apache, we *will* get a
> lot of NT bugs. They'll all be fixed by patching the code with #ifdef
> WIN32 sections and things will get unmanageable. If the patches are in we
> can, were required, abstract Win32 code to fix the bugs.
> 
> //pcs
> 




Mime
View raw message