Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA20929; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 22:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com (ppp0-sierra.zyzzyva.com [208.214.59.46]) by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA20924 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 22:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sierra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sierra.zyzzyva.com (8.8.5/8.8.2) with ESMTP id AAA09688 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 00:01:12 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199708130501.AAA09688@sierra.zyzzyva.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] for 1.2.X: proxy screwup In-reply-to: marcs's message of Tue, 12 Aug 1997 22:08:08 -0600. X-uri: http://www.zyzzyva.com/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 00:01:12 -0500 From: Randy Terbush Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org > On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > This fixes most of the proxy problems mentioned on http-wg. It prevents > > the proxy responses from returning as HTTP/1.1 on errors or when the > > response is from the cache. The only thing I haven't figured out is > > how to handle > > I haven't looked at the patch in detail but, but it looks simple (the > patch looks simple; the ideas behind it aren't necessarily and the > completeness isn't obvious without a good look at the code). > > Do we want to hold 1.2.3 for this? I would say yes. I would vote +1 to hold. It would be nice if this could be our last 1.2 release. > Roy, are you reasonably confident that this patch fixes everything > involved in this problem and will conform to the way things should > be?