Message-Id: <199708090737.AAA07653@mail1.sirius.com>
From: "Eric Esselink" <eesselin@sirius.com>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Subject: Re: apache-bugs mail
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 00:38:05 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

Yeah, the amazing part is that he should blame himself !
Anybody with a little bit of brain would have setup a test site
first to test whether it is actually working (or not).
It's free and people still want more...

----------
> From: Rob Hartill <robh@imdb.com>
> To: Apache Group <new-httpd@hyperreal.org>
> Subject: apache-bugs mail
> Date: Friday, August 08, 1997 4:51 PM
> 
> 
> Dean, here's an example of some garbage...
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 16:17:07 -0600
> From: Gayle Lukeman <tigrnest@frii.com>
> Reply-To: P@ganymede.frii.com, O@ganymede.frii.com,
Box@ganymede.frii.com,
>     270248@ganymede.frii.com, Fort@ganymede.frii.com,
>     Collins@ganymede.frii.com, CO@ganymede.frii.com,
>     80527@ganymede.frii.com
> To: apache-bugs@apache.org
> 
> Thank you for screwing up my cgi program with yours.
> It was working perfectly well until my server put on
> your new version of Stronghold.
> Perhaps you would like to write an apology to all people
> with cgi programs rather than writing in big letters
> don't send any requests for helping debugging cgi.
> You faq is worthless.  You really are not consumer
> oriented and I will be happy to tell my server that
> I will be looking for a new one who is not using your
> programs.  Why don't you consider what problems you cause 
> people before you send out this.  You've screwed up my
> site and I can tell from your site that you don't give
> a damn.  Is this customer friendly service?  I don't think so.
> 
> Gayle Lukeman,  Tiger's Nest
>